ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Optimization of protein extraction and digestion workflows for proteomic analysis of saliva, salivary stones and kidney stones.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Salivary and kidney stone diseases are associated with pathological calcification, yet their molecular composition remains incompletely characterized. Proteomic analysis of saliva and stone material may provide valuable insights into these processes; however, such analyses are technically challenging and strongly dependent on efficient and reproducible sample preparation workflows. Methods: In this study, we systematically evaluated and optimised protein extraction and digestion conditions for proteomic analysis of saliva, salivary stones and kidney stones. Different lysis buffers, sample amounts, sonication parameters and digestion strategies were tested. Additional biological materials, including salivary gland tissue and Results: Optimised workflows significantly improved peptide and protein identification, reduced the proportion of missed cleavages and enhanced sequence coverage across multiple biological matrices. Sonication-assisted protocols proved particularly effective for stone-derived materials, although optimal conditions varied depending on the sample type. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that careful optimisation of protein extraction and digestion is essential for reliable proteomic analysis of challenging biomaterials such as saliva and pathological calcifications. The workflows established here provide a robust methodological foundation for future large-scale and biomarker-oriented proteomic studies of stone disease and related calcification disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.