ArticleACS catalysis2025
Using Yield Profiles to Study Reaction Mechanism.
Article in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photocatalytic Cross-Coupling of Phenols and Heteroaryl Halides With Machine Learning-Guided Reaction Prediction.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Using Yield Profiles to Study Reaction Mechanism.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding reaction mechanisms can help to optimize efficiency, which allows industrially important molecules to be synthesized at a lower cost. Determining mechanisms, however, can be time consuming and resource-intensive. In this work, we outline an expeditious method to differentiate reaction mechanisms by means of unsupervised learning. With this technique, reaction "profiles" are created from the yields of a set of substrates subjected to several different reaction conditions. The resultant profiles are clustered by similarity to reveal mechanistic relationships. We have benchmarked this method with elimination reaction mechanisms, and used it to explore mechanistic relationships among C-H activation and phenol cross coupling catalysts. We determined that our method successfully categorizes elimination reaction mechanisms. Additionally, we found that our method was able to correct mechanistic assignments in C-H activation chemistry, previously misassigned due to the swift progress and discovery of previously unknown mechanisms in the field. Our method can be used to quickly hypothesize a mechanism for C-H activation catalysts with only four experiments. We also predicted potential similarities in phenol oxidative cross coupling catalysts that are mechanistically not well understood. Overall, this method provides a tool that can complement existing methods to study reaction mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.