ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Mechanistic mathematical modeling of abscopal effect reveals mechanisms of off-target tumor response.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Local radiotherapy rarely triggers regression of distant, non-irradiated tumors (the "abscopal" effect), but this outcome is unpredictable because it depends on interacting processes, such as antigen release, antigen presentation, T-cell priming and trafficking, and lymphoid health. To study these interactions quantitatively and identify dominant mechanisms that control off-target tumor responses, we built an integrated physiologically based pharmacokinetic - quantitative systems pharmacology (PBPK-QSP) model. Methods: The PBPK-QSP model tracks immune (dendritic cells, M1/M2 macrophages, Tregs, naïve and effector CD8 Results: Four mechanisms dominate outcome variability: antigen capture/processing by phagocytes (i.e., dendritic cells and macrophages), clearance of dead-cell debris and antigens, and naïve T-cell regenerative capacity in lymph nodes. Phagocytic and clearance rates have context-dependent effects, too fast shortens the antigen-priming window, and too slow results in less overall antigen-priming. Lymph-node irradiation shifts the dependence of immune response to T-cell recovery, which becomes the dominant mechanism. The model also highlights that impaired tumor vascular permeability can constrain effector infiltration and mute intratumoral CD8 Discussion: The PBPK-QSP model identifies specific, actionable mechanisms controlling abscopal responses and suggests three complementary strategies to increase the chance of abscopal responses: i) optimize radiotherapy dose/fractionation to maximize immunogenic antigen release while sparing lymphoid tissue when possible, ii) combine radiotherapy with interventions that prolong productive antigen presentation and modulate debris clearance, and iii) protect/restore lymphoid regenerative capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.