Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918698›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications of online pediatric nutrition consultation: a nursing perspective.

Ling-Ling Ma, Ke-Xin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ling-Ling MaDepartment of Outpatient, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, China.
Ke-Xin WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of rapid global expansion in digital healthcare and growing demand for child nutrition services, this perspective article examines the emerging model of online pediatric nutrition consultation. We argue that while this model offers significant potential to improve accessibility and efficiency, it faces multidimensional challenges. These include technical barriers such as the digital divide and limitations in remote assessment; professional practice issues like constrained communication and inadequate adaptation of clinical tools; and ethical complexities related to privacy, accountability, and equity. To support its responsible development, this perspective article applies a nursing ethics framework-centered on autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice-to analyze these challenges. We further propose integrated strategies focusing on ethics-guided practice, technological standardization, professional competency development, and supportive policy ecosystems to ensure that innovation aligns with safe, equitable, and person-centered care.

Indexed as

care coordinationdigital healthhealth equitynursing ethicspediatric nutritiontelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41918698
PMCPMC13033641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.