Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918666›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) as a Diagnostic and Risk Stratification Tool for a Patient With Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Complex Phenotype and Tricuspid Annular Disjunction (TAD).

Mahmoud Raslan, Xi Na Huang, Zeyad M Elmarzouky

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmoud RaslanCardiology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, GBR.
Xi Na HuangCardiology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, GBR.
Zeyad M ElmarzoukyCardiology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrhythmogenic mitral valve disease (AMVD) is a newly established entity that carries a high risk of developing ventricular arrhythmia ranging from premature ventricular contraction to sudden cardiac death. Therefore, there is an urgent need for risk prediction and stratification by using different imaging modalities. A 77-year-old patient presented with a syncopal episode. Physical examination was unremarkable. Resting electrocardiogram (ECG) was normal. Echocardiography showed mild systolic dysfunction and mild aortic stenosis. Seven days of Holter monitor recording demonstrated frequent episodes of polymorphic ventricular contraction and one episode of sinus bradycardia. Therefore, the patient was scheduled for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) which was successful in revealing the etiology of the presentation. Biannuli disjunction and mitral valve prolapse could be clearly visualized in our CMR study. Consequently, the patient was referred for an urgent clinical consultation by the electrophysiology heart team and implantable loop recorder. A review of the six-week recording showed further episodes of narrow complex tachycardia with rates up to 222 beats per minute (bpm) associated with one episode of pre-syncope. He was prescribed bisoprolol and scheduled for regular follow-up at the arrhythmia clinic. In our report, we present a case of AMVD when the definite diagnosis could not be revealed by using the echocardiography modality alone. However, CMR has been proven successful in establishing a diagnosis and unveiling the etiology of the presentation.

Indexed as

arrhythmogenic mitral valve complexcardiac mrimitral annular disjunctionmitral valve prolapsetricuspid annular disjunction

Identifiers

PMID41918666
PMCPMC13035058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.