Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918614›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

An experimental perspective on symmetry breaking and the singlet fission mechanism in solid-state materials.

Xinyue Xu, Christopher R Hall, Trevor A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyue XuSchool of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia trevoras@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9349-8703
Christopher R HallSchool of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia trevoras@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-1277
Trevor A SmithSchool of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia trevoras@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-9713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singlet fission (SF) materials have attracted attention in the field of solar cell research for decades. The deployment of novel and efficient SF molecules necessitates solution processibility and high SF yield in the solid state. SF materials can be integrated with silicon or organic photovoltaics, most commonly as a thin film layer on top of the semiconducting material. These films can be inhomogeneous, consisting of different structural domains with different crystalline structures or degrees of crystallinity, making the study of SF in the solid state highly challenging. Morphological inhomogeneity may also disturb the local molecular or crystal symmetry, leading to potential changes in the SF mechanism. In this perspective, we analyse and combine approaches in both selecting model systems and using advanced spectroscopic methods to devise an approach to rigorously analyse SF materials in the solid state, with special emphasis on discussing how symmetry breaking (SB) processes such as formal charge transfer and SB vibrations can impact the key mechanistic steps of SF. From a material perspective, we critically discuss the advantages and drawbacks of using dimers/oligomers, nanoparticles, and aggregates as model systems, as well as methods for manipulating and controlling molecular stacking environments. Then, we provide a brief review of recent developments in advanced spectroscopic methods and the key findings of research relevant to SF in the solid state.

Identifiers

PMID41918614
PMCPMC13034074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.