ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Low Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Plaque Instability and Stroke Recurrence in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating biomarkers of carotid plaque vulnerability: current evidence, emerging markers, and barriers to clinical implementation.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Systemic Inflammation and White Matter Hyperintensities Associated with Cognitive Impairment in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: While our previous cross-sectional study linked the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) to symptomatic ICAS and plaque inflammation, its prospective value for predicting stroke recurrence remained unexplored. This study aimed to validate the association between LMR and plaque instability in a larger cohort and, critically, to determine whether baseline LMR predicts future ischemic events. Methods: We prospectively enrolled adult patients with radiologically confirmed ICAS from April 2018 to July 2024 at our tertiary cerebrovascular center. Comprehensive datasets, including clinical characteristics, laboratory markers (LMR and full inflammatory profiles), and neuroimaging features, were systematically collected and analyzed. Hematologic markers were compared between patients with ICAS with and without plaque enhancement and between those with and without symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the discriminative value of LMR for plaque instability and determine optimal cutoff points. A follow-up was conducted to record stroke recurrence and evaluate the predictive role of baseline LMR. Results: We included 132 patients with confirmed ICAS. LMR emerged as an independent predictor of both plaque enhancement and symptomatic ICAS. An LMR cutoff of 4.0 effectively distinguished symptomatic from asymptomatic plaques. In 120 patients with ICAS with follow-up data, those with LMR of ≤ 4.0 had significantly higher recurrence (32.1% vs 15.6%, P = 0.026) and shorter median recurrence time ( Conclusion: A low LMR is associated with plaque instability in ICAS, and an LMR ≤ 4.0 may serve as a practical and accessible hematologic marker that could help identify patients at increased short-term risk of stroke recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.