Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Risk and protective factors of near-lethal suicide attempts in adolescents.

Andrea Chen, Steffen Franke, Abel Stolz, Rainer Papsdorf, Georg von Polier, Daniel Radeloff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea ChenClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Steffen FrankeData Integrations Center, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abel StolzData Integrations Center, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rainer PapsdorfClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg von PolierClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Daniel RadeloffClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents exhibit high rates of suicide attempts but comparatively low rates of suicides. While many studies focus on suicide attempts, it is unclear if findings apply to suicides. Studying near-lethal suicide attempts (NLSA) as approximations of suicides is an underexplored approach. This study aimed to identify differences between lower-risk suicide attempts (LRSA) and NLSA. Methods: Using a standardized clinical survey, suicidal phenomena, risk and protective factors were assessed in a clinical population at first contact from 2018 to 2022. NLSA (N = 17) were identified using strict criteria and compared with LRSA (N = 106) in terms of risk and protective factors using χ² and t-tests for independent samples. Results: Prior suicide attempts were less frequent in NLSA than in LRSA (58.8% Conclusion: The findings highlight the role of communication in suicide prevention, underscoring the need for easily accessible mental health services. Given the small NLSA sample, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and require replication in larger, prospectively designed studies to inform more targeted prevention strategies.

Indexed as

adolescenceattemptcommunicationnear-lethalpreventionrisk factorssuicide

Identifiers

PMID41918577
PMCPMC13033975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.