ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
No Unique Magnocellular Facilitation in Parafoveal Processing: A Combined EEG and Eye Tracking Study.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapidly processed magnocellular (M) information may facilitate visual object recognition but its role in reading is unclear. A previous study with Chinese characters and masked foveal primes did not find a unique role of the M system as compared to the parvocellular (P) system in mediating repetition effects. As M cells are better represented in the parafoveal visual field, the present study tested whether the M and P systems contribute differentially to parafoveal processing during reading. We combined EEG recordings and eye tracking to measure parafoveal preview effects in fixation-related potentials, using the boundary paradigm. In two experiments, we contrasted high versus low spatial frequency previews and luminance versus color contrast previews and also included standard previews as a manipulation check. As expected, the N250 component was diminished after valid as compared to invalid normal previews, especially over the left hemisphere. We also obtained left-lateralized preview effects for the N250 component for both M- and P-biased previews in both experiments. In the experiment involving a spatial frequency manipulation, P-biased preview effects tended to be larger than M-biased preview effects over the left hemisphere, but not over the right hemisphere. No interactions with preview validity were found for the luminance contrast manipulation. This null effect was supported by a Bayesian analysis. Taken together, these results indicate that the M pathway does not exclusively mediate the preview effect, even for stimuli presented in the parafovea. Instead, both M- and P-based information appear to contribute to early, left-lateralized neural processes underlying visual word recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.