ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2026
Assessing Best Locations for Mini-Implants in the Mandibular Symphysis Based on Different Mandibular Growth Patterns: A CBCT Study.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Vertical Skeletal Pattern and Mandibular Cortical Morphology: A CBCT-Based Radiomorphometric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2026
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim was to evaluate optimum site for insertion of orthodontic mini-implants at mandibular symphysis in patient with different mandibular growth patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The objectives were to evaluate and measure complete bone width (CBW) and cortical bone width (CtBW) in the symphysis area at various heights [2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm from cementoenamel junction (CEJ)] and at various angles (0º, 10º, 20º, 30º, 40º, 50º, and 60º to the occlusal plane), and to assess the effect of mandibular growth patterns (low, average, and high angle) on these measurements. Methods: The study sample included 45 patients aged 16-30 years. Patients were categorized into three groups (n=15) corresponding to the mandibular growth pattern for the assessment of CBW and CtBW. Individual data for each patient were entered into a master table in Microsoft Excel and subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 22.0. Analysis of variance was applied to investigate the influence of insertion location, facial type, insertion height and insertion angle on overall bone thickness and CtBW. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Intra-observer reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: CBW was notably greater in patients with a low-angle mandibular growth pattern than in patients with other mandibular growth patterns at insertion heights of 8, 10, and 12 mm. CtBW was greater in cases with a low-angle mandibular growth pattern than in cases with other mandibular growth patterns. Similar results were observed for CtBW. Conclusion: The mandibular symphysis in patients with a low-angle growth pattern provides more favorable anatomical conditions for mini-implant placement. The ideal insertion site lies between 6 and 10 mm below the CEJ of the central incisors, with angulation ranging from 0° to 60° relative to the occlusal plane. CBCT assessment should be considered essential in treatment planning to customize implant positioning based on individual growth patterns, thereby enhancing implant stability and success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.