ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Variation in oral liquid medicine concentrations dispensed to children and adults in primary care in England.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescribing for the patient and the planet: a pragmatic feasibility study of a behaviour change intervention to reduce liquid amoxicillin prescribing in primary care.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Variation in oral liquid medicine concentrations dispensed to children and adults in primary care in England.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe study aims to characterize the variability in concentrations of oral liquid medicines (OLMs) dispensed in primary care in England.
methodsData detailing all liquid medicines dispensed in primary care in England from February 2019 to January 2020, stratified by age into children (<18 years) and adults (≥18 years), were obtained from the NHS Business Services Authority. For each drug licensing status, the number of prescription items and unique concentrations were examined. For each age group, the 30 drugs most commonly dispensed at multiple concentrations, representing over 50% of prescriptions, were analysed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
resultsOf the 44.2 million OLM prescription items, 42% were for children. Adjusted for relative sizes of the two populations, children were 2.5 times more likely to be dispensed an OLM than an adult. Children received 294 unique drugs and adults 319. Of the drugs dispensed, 51.4% and 49.2% were supplied in multiple concentrations to children (median 3; range 2-13) and adults (median 3; range 2-11), respectively. Approximately 0.9% of prescription items dispensed to children were unlicensed, and 0.29% for adults, indicating that children were three times more likely to receive an unlicensed product.
conclusionsOLMs are widely used in adults and children, although an individual child is more likely to receive an OLM than an individual adult. The availability of multiple OLM concentrations per drug is common, for both licensed and unlicensed products. Rationalization could be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.