ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2026
Unveiling the Therapeutic Spectrum of Annona reticulata Linn.: Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Antidiarrheal Insights.
Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Therapeutic Spectrum of Annona reticulata Linn.: Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Antidiarrheal Insights.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The focus of recent research has been on developing natural medicines. Natural substances of the Annona reticulata Linn. plant, which belongs to the Annonaceae family, have medicinal uses. The antibacterial, insecticidal, and antidiarrheal properties of Annona reticulata Linn. methanol and aqueous leaf fractions were assessed in this study along with phytochemical screening and GC-MS analysis. Both extracts' antibacterial properties were evaluated at a dosage of 250 mg/mL using the disc diffusion method. While the zones of inhibition values for aqueous extract were lower than those for methanol extract, the zones of inhibition values for methanol leaf extract against specific gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains were almost equivalent to those obtained from the standard drug tetracycline hydrochloride. The methanol extract showed strong insecticidal potential against T. castaneum and P. americana, which was found to be even more effective than the standard permethrin solution. Additionally, the aqueous leaf extract showed good insecticidal activity; however, it was less effective than the methanolic extract. Castor oil-induced diarrhea test was utilized for assessment of antidiarrheal potentials; at dosages of 200 and 400 mg/kg of body weight, methanol and aqueous fractions showed significant outcomes with notable onset of diarrhea and total quantity of feces values (p < 0.001). Both methanol and aqueous leaf fractions demonstrated percentage inhibition of diarrhea values of 44.19% and 41.86%, respectively, at a 400 mg/kg dosage. In the enteropooling test, the castor oil-induced intestinal volume was also significantly (p < 0.001) decreased by both methanol and aqueous extracts. Furthermore, intestinal transit was inhibited by aqueous and methanol extracts by 50.89% and 52.78%, respectively, at a 400 mg/kg dosage in GI motility tests. The outcomes significantly resembled those of the standard drug loperamide (5 mg/kg). Plant extracts were screened for certain phytochemicals using a preliminary phytochemical screening assay. GC-MS analysis was utilized for the determination of the chemical constituents that were responsible for achieving these activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.