ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026
Atomistic Insights into Conformations and Solvation Dynamics of Amylose, Dextran, and Pullulan Using Three Force Fields.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extraction, Structure-Activity Relationships, and Modification of Plant-Derived Polysaccharides: An Integrated Framework for Evidence-Based Method Selection and Bioactivity Optimization-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of three α-glucans─amylose, dextran, and pullulan─were performed in explicit solvent to investigate how differences in their glycosidic linkages influence molecular conformation and solvation dynamics, and to assess the performance of three major force fields (FFs): CHARMM36, GLYCAM06, and OPLS-AA. Structural analysis revealed that amylose adopts a more extended and constrained conformation owing to its α-(1 → 4) linkages, whereas dextran and pullulan exhibit more collapsed structures. Differences in linkage chemistry also influenced the organization of surrounding water, with this effect more pronounced in CHARMM than in GLYCAM or OPLS. Dextran formed more stable hydrogen bonds with water than amylose or pullulan. Although glucan-water nonbonded interactions were energetically more favorable in GLYCAM and OPLS, these FFs also predicted stronger nonpolar interactions that promoted more compact glucan conformations. Overall, the results indicate that glucan-glucan interactions contribute comparably to glucan-water interactions in determining polysaccharide structure. These insights clarify molecular determinants of glucan solubility and hydration and provide a basis for designing glucan-based materials with tunable properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.