Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918368›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2026

Preoperative biliary drainage versus upfront surgery in moderately jaundiced patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-institution comparative study.

Kaushal Singh Rathore, Gaurav Kaushal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaushal Singh RathoreDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9133-2667
Gaurav KaushalDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8945-357X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: The effect of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients with moderate jaundice (10-15 mg/dL) remains understudied. While PBD aims to improve hepatic function, it may increase morbidity due to infections. Methods: This study analyzed PDs performed between July 2022 and 2025. Patients with periampullary cancers and bilirubin levels of 10-15 mg/dL were included. We compared patients who underwent upfront PD (upfront surgery [UP] group) with those who received PBD (via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage) regarding perioperative outcomes, morbidity, mortality, bile microbiology, antibiotic use, and costs. Results: Among 92 PD patients, 40 met the inclusion criteria (UP = 16; PBD = 24). Baseline characteristics were comparable, except for higher bilirubin levels in the UP group (12.6 mg/dL vs. 1.35 mg/dL, Conclusions: In patients with moderate jaundice (10-15 mg/dL), upfront PD can be performed safely. Routine PBD offers no clinical benefit and is associated with higher rates of SSIs, bile contamination, and increased costs.

Indexed as

Biliary drainageCosts and cost analysisJaundice, obstructivePancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID41918368
PMCPMC13212022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.