ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Real-World Outcomes of Baricitinib and Ritlecitinib in Refractory Alopecia Areata: Response Predictors and Relapse After Discontinuation or Dose Reduction.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Baricitinib and Ritlecitinib in Severe Alopecia Areata: A Real-World Monocentric Retrospective Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Baricitinib and ritlecitinib are newly approved systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for severe, refractory alopecia areata (AA). Although clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy, real-world evidence remains limited, particularly regarding predictors of response and outcomes following treatment interruption or dose tapering. To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of baricitinib and ritlecitinib in adults with refractory AA, and to identify factors associated with treatment response and relapse. We retrospectively reviewed 65 adults with refractory AA treated at a tertiary center (baricitinib 4 mg/day, n = 50; ritlecitinib 50 mg/day, n = 15). Scalp regrowth was evaluated using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) up to Week 52, with response defined as SALT ≤ 20 (≥ 80% scalp coverage). Predictors of Week 36 response were assessed in the baricitinib cohort using multivariable logistic regression. Relapse outcomes after treatment discontinuation or dose reduction were documented with extended follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. At Week 36, 42% of patients receiving baricitinib achieved SALT ≤ 20, comparable to the ritlecitinib group (41.7%). In the baricitinib cohort, disease duration < 2 years and baseline eyebrow loss (ClinRO score 3) independently predicted Week 36 response (p < 0.05). All four responders who discontinued baricitinib relapsed (mean 14.7 weeks). Among 13 patients who reduced the dose to 2 mg/day, relapse occurred in 6/12 evaluable cases (mean 24.2 weeks). Most AEs were mild, and no serious events occurred. Baricitinib demonstrated meaningful real-world efficacy, particularly in patients with shorter disease duration and baseline eyebrow involvement. Relapse was common after treatment cessation or dose tapering, supporting the need for close monitoring for approximately 3 months after discontinuation and at least 6 months following dose reduction. These findings may inform patient selection and long-term treatment planning, and highlight the importance of further prospective studies to optimize JAK inhibitor management in AA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.