ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Monitoring and Managing of Ergot Alkaloids in Cereal Grains: A Comprehensive Analysis of Analytical Challenges, Sampling Uncertainty, and Processing for Food Safety.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Total Ergot Alkaloids Determination by ELISA and UHPLC-MS/MS in Wheat: Implications of Cross-Reactivity and Matrix Effects.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ergot alkaloids (EAs), toxic secondary metabolites produced by Claviceps purpurea, pose food and feed safety concerns for cereal grains, particularly rye and wheat. While EAs are most frequently associated with rye, their occurrence in other cereals has been increasingly reported across diverse regions. This review critically synthesizes current knowledge on the global occurrence, analytical detection, regulatory control, and processing behavior of EAs, with a particular focus on factors that limit data reliability and risk management. A defining challenge in EA monitoring is the highly heterogeneous distribution of ergot sclerotia and alkaloids within bulk grain, which introduces substantial sampling uncertainty that often exceeds analytical variability. Recent advances in comminution, spatial sampling models, and composite sampling strategies have improved representativeness, yet remain underemphasized relative to instrumental developments. Analytical methods have progressed from nonspecific HPLC approaches to high-throughput LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS platforms, enabling sensitive, multi-analyte detection and epimer-specific quantification; however, persistent limitations, including matrix effects, limited availability of reference materials, and insufficient characterization of conjugated or matrix-bound EAs, continue to constrain comparability across studies. Regulatory approaches vary globally, with the European Union adopting chemical limits for total EAs, while other regions rely primarily on sclerotia-based grading. Climate change and evolving agricultural practices further complicate exposure assessment and mitigation. By integrating sampling theory, analytical chemistry, processing effects, and regulatory frameworks, this review provides a unified perspective on EA risk management and identifies priorities for future research, including harmonized sampling strategies and high-throughput analytical platforms capable of capturing both free and conjugated EA forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.