Trial reportAddiction science & clinical practice2026
App-based skills training to reduce problem drinking among adult internet help-seekers: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03696888 (Reducing Risky Alcohol Consumption Using Skills-training in the App-form), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reducing Risky Alcohol Consumption Using Skills-training in the App-form: A Randomized Controlled Study in the General Population.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProblem drinking (PD), defined as hazardous or harmful drinking, constitutes a major health and economic burden worldwide. However, most individuals with PD typically remain untreated for many years as part of the “treatment gap” between prevalence and treatment access. The main objective of this study was to evaluate an unguided, app-based intervention for reducing alcohol consumption, compared to an information control app. Secondary analyses targeted motivation effects, subgroup differences in heavy drinking days, and the proportion of participants with excessive drinking.
methodsIn this two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT), Swedish-speaking adults seeking help for PD on the Internet were recruited via online ads (n = 576). Eligible participants, defined as those who reported PD without significant comorbid conditions, were randomly assigned to one of two unguided interventions, either the “TeleCoach” app (n = 293) or the information control app (n = 283), and followed up via online questionnaires at six-, 12- and 26-weeks post-recruitment. Participants and researchers were blinded to group assignment at recruitment but not for outcome analyses. The primary outcome was the number of standard drinks consumed per week.
resultsParticipants reported drinking a mean of 28 (SD = 18) standard drinks per week at the baseline recruitment measure, and 65% of the participants reported a history of PD for over three years; only 7% of the participants reported less than a year of PD history. Only 26% of the participants had sought help before. A significant within-group reduction in alcohol consumption occurred in both conditions at the six-week follow-up (B = −10.57, SE = 0.83, 95% CI [−12.20, −8.94], p < 0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.69), sustained until the 26-week follow-up (B = −11.44, SE = 0.91, 95% CI [−13.23, −9.65], p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.67), with no significant differences between the two groups. No adverse events were reported.
conclusionsThe findings, although null, nonetheless supported app-based interventions’ feasibility and potential as a scalable digital approach for reaching individuals who have not previously sought help for PD.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03696888, Oct 5, 2018; analysis plan at https://osf.io/wxfqg , on Dec. 18, 2023 prior to analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.