Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917971›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2026

Bridging radiotherapy before anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for Large B-cell lymphoma - results from a single-center study.

Sebastian M Stolz, Camilla von Wachter, Jonas Willmann, Max J Rieger, Stefanie Kreutmair, Weeda Mamozai, Wiebke Rösler, Philipp Hockl, Maiwand Ahmadsei, Sebastian M Christ and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sebastian M StolzDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Camilla von WachterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WillmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Max J RiegerDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefanie KreutmairDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Weeda MamozaiDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Wiebke RöslerDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp HocklDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maiwand AhmadseiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sebastian M ChristDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laura MotisiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik SchneidawindDepartment for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael MayingerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. michael.mayinger@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy (RT) with immunochemotherapy (ICT) followed by CAR T-cell therapy may have synergistic effects due to cytoreduction and enhancing antigen spread, thereby inducing anti-cancer immune responses. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospective comparative data on the use of RT prior to anti-CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy with a special focus on cytoreduction and RT related side effects.

methodsAll patients aged ≥ 18 years with relapsed/ refractory Large B-Cell-lymphoma (r/r LBCL) treated with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in our institution from 05/ 2019-08/2023 were analyzed retrospectively, with the RT therapy group comprising all patients receiving RT with or without concomitant systemic therapy. The control (CO) group was manually matched on age, prior therapy lines and remission state at lymphodepletion. Post-RT tumor volumes (TV) were calculated for 6 out of 7 patients pre-CAR T and for 1 patient post-CAR T. Primary endpoints were reduction of TV and CAR T as well as RT related side effects. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

results8 patients receiving RT within 60 days prior to CAR T-cell infusion and 8 controls were included in the final analysis. 6 out of 8 patients received concomitant bridging therapy. RT alone or in combination with concomitant systemic therapy led to a significant reduction of TV (average reduction of 68%) within the radiated field from baseline to post RT (p = 0.028). The combination of RT and CAR T-cell therapy was not associated with an increased rate of CAR T related side effects or complications (cytokine release syndrome p = 0.6, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity p = 0.2, corticosteroid use p > 0.9, Tocilizumab use p > 0.9, transfer to intensive care unit p = 0.6). OS and PFS did not differ between the RT- and CO-group (OS p = 0.64, PFS p = 0.35).

conclusionsOur data indicate that RT is a feasible and effective way of cytoreduction before CAR T-cell therapy, also in combination with systemic chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD19Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAgedBridge TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric AntigenBridging therapyCAR T-cell therapyRadiotherapyTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID41917971
PMCPMC13154906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.