ArticleBMC nursing2026
Meta-integration of qualitative research on the clinical work experiences of emergency department nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA growing body of evidence indicates that emergency department nurses are frequently exposed to high-intensity work-related stress, complex emotional demands, and occupational hazards in their clinical practice. These factors significantly influence their job satisfaction and retention intention. This meta-integrated qualitative study aimed to systematically examine the clinical work experiences of emergency department nurses, with a focus on identifying stressors, coping mechanisms, and emotional dynamics, in order to provide an evidence-based foundation for optimizing the emergency nursing work environment.
methodsA qualitative systematic review was conducted. Electronic searches were performed across the databases CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, OVID, and SinoMed (CBM), covering all records from inception to 10 February 2025. Eligible studies focusing on the clinical work experiences of emergency department nurses were selected. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data were synthesized using a meta-integration approach. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
resultsA total of 18 studies were included, yielding 40 individual findings that were classified into 8 thematic categories. These were further synthesized into three overarching integrative themes: (1) the Organizational–Clinical Stress Ecosystem, (2) Resilience-Building Mechanisms, and (3) the Duality of Professional Identity.
conclusionHospital administrators should prioritize the physical and psychological well-being of emergency department nurses. It is essential to assist nurses in adjusting to their work conditions by reducing night shift frequency, enhancing staffing ratios, and reinforcing diverse forms of support. Furthermore, providing more opportunities for skill development and professional training that integrates theoretical knowledge with clinical practice is recommended. Practical and evidence-informed management policies should be implemented to improve the sustainability of emergency nursing workforce retention. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.