Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917926›Full record

Observational studyBMC surgery2026

The effect of sedation methods on early postoperative cognitive decline in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery with spinal anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

Ahmet Said Çetinkaya, Derya Arslan Yurtlu, Ahmet Salih Tüzen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05737459 (The Effect of Sedation on Postoperative Cognitive Functions in Patients Operated for Hip Fracture Under Spinal Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05737459 completednot on this map

The Effect of Sedation on Postoperative Cognitive Functions in Patients Operated for Hip Fracture Under Spinal Anesthesia

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIzmir Ataturk Training and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled82ConditionsCognitive Impairment, Femoral Fractures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmet Said ÇetinkayaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Karabük University Training and Research Hospital, Karabük, Turkey.
Derya Arslan YurtluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Izmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Bayraklı City Hospital, Refik Sevket Ince District, 2148/11 Street, Number:1/11 Bayrakli, Izmir, Turkey. darslanyurtlu@yahoo.com.
Ahmet Salih TüzenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Izmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly postoperative cognitive decline is common in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and may contribute to delayed recovery and diminished long-term independence. Although spinal anesthesia is associated with reduced systemic cognitive burden, intraoperative sedation remains necessary and may influence neurocognitive outcomes. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine are sedative agents with proposed neuroprotective properties; however, their comparative cognitive safety in the context of spinal anesthesia remains poorly understood. Thus, our study aim to compare early postoperative cognitive outcomes between intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketamine used for intraoperative sedation during spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study, elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine on early postoperative cognitive function. The primary outcome was MMSE score on postoperative days 1 and 3. Secondary outcomes included Clock Drawing Test (CDT) scores, length of stay, and perioperative complications. Cognitive assessments were conducted preoperatively, and postoperatively on days 1 and 3 by blinded clinicians.

resultsEighty-two patients [dexmedetomidine (n = 41), and ketamine (n = 41)] were analyzed. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable. Postoperative MMSE scores were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group on both day 1 (21.4 ± 4.0 vs. 17.1 ± 5.4; p < 0.001) and day 3 (21.9 ± 3.9 vs. 17.6 ± 5.7; p < 0.001). Both groups exhibited a decline in MMSE scores on postoperative day 1, with partial recovery by day 3; scores remained significantly lower than baseline levels (p < 0.01 for both groups). The magnitude of MMSE decline was statistically smaller in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the ketamine group (p < 0.001). Similarly, CDT scores declined from baseline on postoperative day 1, and showed moderate improvement by day 3. However, no significant differences were observed in CDT scores or complication rates between groups. Sedation depth and intraoperative analgesia were comparable, aside from transient differences at the 5th minute post-sedation.

conclusionDexmedetomidine was associated with less early postoperative MMSE decline compared with ketamine in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia. These findings reflect differences in early postoperative cognitive trajectory rather than established postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

trial registrationDate of Registration: 02/02/2023 (Retrospectively registered). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05737459.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalCognitive DysfunctionDexmedetomidineHip FracturesHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePostoperative Cognitive ComplicationsPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AnesthesiaHumansMaleProspective StudiesDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineAgedDexmedetomidineHip fracturesKetaminePostoperative cognitive impairmentSpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID41917926
PMCPMC13170041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.