ArticleBMC oral health2026
Patients' knowledge and attitudes towards endodontic treatment in Türkiye: a survey-based study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, awareness, and experiences of patients in Türkiye regarding endodontic treatment.
methodsThis study was designed as a questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire was prepared using Google Forms and administered on a voluntary basis. Survey questions were distributed online via social media platforms and e-mail to adult participants residing in different regions of Türkiye. However, the sample was not designed to be nationally representative of the Turkish population. Participants were asked to answer a total of 19 questions. Data from 454 completed questionnaires were analyzed statistically to assess participants’ experiences, expectations, and concerns regarding root canal treatment. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsDifferences were observed in participants’ knowledge and awareness regarding endodontic treatment. Night pain and toothache or fracture were the most commonly reported indications for RCT. A statistically significant association was found between age group and perceptions regarding the need for RCT (p < 0.05).
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this survey-based study, differences were observed in participants’ knowledge and awareness regarding endodontic treatment. Improving public understanding may support informed decision-making and appropriate treatment-seeking behavior. Further multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.