SynthesisBMC pediatrics2026
Educational practices for promoting healthy hydration in primary education in the face of climate change: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is increasing children’s exposure to heat and, consequently, their risk of dehydration during their primary school years. Yet hydration education is not consistently embedded in education policy or primary curricula. This systematic review, reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020, examined school-based educational practices designed to promote healthy hydration in Primary Education (6 to 12 years). A search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection on January 29th, 2025 for studies published between 2015 and 2024. Two reviewers independently screened records and assessed risk of bias using design-appropriate tools (RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and JBI checklists). Given the substantial heterogeneity in intervention components and outcome indicators, a narrative synthesis was performed. Twelve studies were included, spanning randomized and non-randomized interventions and observational and qualitative or documentary designs across diverse school contexts. Overall, multi-component approaches, particularly those combining improved access to drinking water with classroom-based educational activities and routine supports, were associated with increased water intake, and when measured, improved physiological hydration indicators. Evidence for broader outcomes, including cognitive or academic measures and sustainability-related awareness, was mixed and dependent on the outcome assessed. Risk of bias ranged from low to high; common limitations included reliance on self-reported intake, short intervention duration, limited control for confounding in non-randomized designs, and scarce medium- to long-term follow-up. Future research should prioritize standardized and validated hydration measures, clearer specification of educational strategies, including teacher roles and competencies, and longer follow-up to strengthen the evidence base under climate-related heat risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.