Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917883›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Automated deep-learning quantification of intramuscular fat in lumbar spine muscles on Dixon MRI: validation and normative reference values from 173 healthy adults.

Germán Balerdi, Johann Henckel, Anna Di Laura, Alister J Hart, Martín A Belzunce

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Germán BalerdiCentro Universitario de Imágenes Médicas (CEUNIM), Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Johann HenckelRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Anna Di LauraRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Alister J HartRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1281-6886
Martín A BelzunceCentro Universitario de Imágenes Médicas (CEUNIM), Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina. mbelzunce@unsam.edu.ar.ORCID 0000-0001-6085-484X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntramuscular fat (IMF) accumulation in lumbar‑spine muscles is associated with sarcopenia, low‑back pain and poorer surgical outcomes. Dixon MRI allows the measurement of IMF with voxel-wise fat fraction (FF) mapping, but quantitative use in research or clinics is limited by labour-intensive 3D muscle segmentation and by the absence of healthy reference data. We present a lightweight pipeline that requires a small number of labelled images yet delivers accurate segmentation and Dixon-based reference ranges for lumbar spine IMF in asymptomatic adults with diverse physical activity levels.

methodsTwenty-six Dixon scans (44.8 ± 14.3 years old; 12 males / 14 females) were manually annotated for psoas, iliacus, quadratus lumborum and the erector spinae + multifidus complex. A 3D U‑Net was trained with a realistic data augmentation scheme that combines small rigid rotations and non-linear B-spline deformations mimicking real anatomical variability, enhancing generalisation. Mean fat fraction (FF) of each muscle was extracted from Dixon FF images. Segmentation (Dice, relative volume difference, Hausdorff distance) and FF estimation accuracy was assessed with a five‑fold Monte‑Carlo cross‑validation and was compared to a multi-atlas approach. FF agreement with manual measurements was examined using linear regression and Bland–Altman analysis. The trained model then processed the complete study cohort of 173 healthy adults (20–70 years old; sedentary to highly active) to derive healthy subjects FF percentiles.

resultsAutomated FF strongly correlated with manual derived values (R² = 0.96), showing no systematic bias. The 3D U-Net achieved Dice coefficients of up to 0.936 (erector spinae + multifidus) and demonstrated superior performance over multi-atlas segmentation across all metrics (p < 0.01). The model was also able to capture different characteristic FF values for each muscle, with median (IQR) normative FF values of 21.8% (17.4–26.9%) for erector spinae + multifidus, 18.0% (14.9–22.2%) for quadratus lumborum, 13.4% (10.5–16.3%) for psoas and 11.6% (9.5–13.8%) for iliacus, with significant sex and activity differences (p < 0.01).

conclusionWith fewer than 30 manual annotations, a 3D U-Net model enhanced by anatomically realistic data augmentation, provides a reliable and accurate solution for automated IMF quantification from Dixon MRI. We deliver novel Dixon MRI reference values of lumbar spine muscle composition in healthy adults. Both the automated estimation of FF, and the reference FF values reported here, facilitates the study of sarcopenia, spinal pathologies, and muscle degeneration.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDeep LearningLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalParaspinal MusclesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesYoung AdultDeep LearningIntramuscular fatLumbar spineMRIMuscle healthMusculoskeletalQuantitative MRI

Identifiers

PMID41917883
PMCPMC13130419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.