ArticleBMC oral health2026
Effects of printing orientation on the mechanical performance of 3D-printed PMMA resins.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of printing orientation on the mechanical and physical properties of three different 3D-printed PMMA denture base resins. The null hypothesis was that printing orientation would not significantly influence flexural strength, maximum force, and elastic modulus of these resins.
methodsSpecimens were printed using DLP technology at 0°, 45°, and 90° orientations with a layer thickness of 100 μm. Three different resins (Asiga DentaBASE, Saremco DENTURETEC, and Armeara DENTURE) were tested. Maximum force, flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured using a universal testing machine in accordance with ISO 20795-1 standards. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsPrinting orientation significantly affected all mechanical properties (p < 0.05). At 0°, Armeara resin demonstrated the highest flexural strength, while Asiga resin exhibited superior elastic modulus at 45° and 90°. The 45° orientation generally resulted in lower values across most parameters. These findings rejected the null hypothesis, indicating that print orientation is a critical determinant of resin performance.
conclusionPrint orientation plays a significant role in determining the mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed PMMA resins. Different orientations should be strategically chosen depending on the mechanical requirements of the intended application. Among the resins, Armeara excelled in flexural strength at 0°, while Asiga performed best in stiffness at higher angles. Optimising print orientation and material selection can significantly enhance the mechanical properties and durability of 3D-printed PMMA denture bases, ultimately improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.