ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Comparative evaluation of deep learning models for lung segmentation in chest X-rays: applications in infectious disease screening.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory infections such as pneumonia and tuberculosis remain the leading contributors to global morbidity and mortality, and early diagnosis is essential for effective treatment. Chest X-ray imaging is widely used for the detection of these conditions; however, reliable interpretation requires accurate delineation of lung fields. Manual annotation is time-consuming and prone to variability, underscoring the need for automated segmentation methods. In this study, we conducted a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art deep learning architectures for binary lung segmentation, including U-Net, Attention U-Net, Double U-Net, U2-Net, VGG-UNet, UNet++, ResNet-UNet, Dense-UNet, Swin U-Net and HieraSeg Net. The performance of the model was compared using the dice coefficient, the intersection of the union (IoU), the mean absolute error (MAE), the Hausdorff distance and the average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Among these models, Dense-UNet achieved the best results, yielding a Dice score of 0.9848 and an IoU of 0.9700, with the lowest surface error measures. These findings highlight the potential of Dense-UNet to serve as a robust backbone for AI-assisted diagnostic systems in infectious respiratory diseases, thereby supporting faster, more reliable, and scalable approaches to clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.