Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917861›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Retrieval‑augmented large language models for depression screening and suicide risk stratification.

Wenbo Xie, Xulai Song, Zerui Lu, Gaoqiang Fei, Yujia Zhou, Siqi Ding, Fengyi Zuo, Bangyu Wu, Tianhao Gu, Lin Xu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wenbo Xie *The Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xulai Song *The Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zerui Lu *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Gaoqiang Fei *Office of Jiangsu Cancer Center, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China.
Yujia ZhouThe Second Clinical Medical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Siqi DingDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fengyi ZuoThe Second Clinical Medical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Bangyu WuThe Second Clinical Medical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Tianhao GuThe Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lin XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Xiaomeng DeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, China. dexiaomeng2001@163.com.
Bin ZhuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, Cancer Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, China. jszb96@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression imposes substantial individual and societal burdens, yet more than 80% of cases remain undetected in non‑psychiatric settings, and approximately 15% of individuals with severe depression die by suicide. Existing screening methods are limited by subjective self‑report, fragmented care pathways, and stigma‑related underutilization.

methodsWe developed and locally deployed a Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) with an evidence‑based clinical knowledge base for depression and suicidality. Three leading Chinese LLMs (DeepSeek, Qwen, Baichuan) were evaluated under base and RAG‑augmented configurations. The knowledge base comprised clinical practice guidelines, standard textbooks, and peer‑reviewed literature. Model performance was assessed on multi‑source datasets. Outcomes included classification of depression and suicide risk, consistency of diagnostic outputs, symptom‑summary quality, and clinician‑rated empathy and dialogue quality.

resultsRAG augmentation consistently improved diagnostic performance across datasets. For depression detection, Qwen3 + RAG achieved an F1‑score of 0.9107, and for suicide risk stratification, RAG enhanced F1‑scores by approximately 0.15 compared with non‑RAG baselines. The best‑performing configuration demonstrated high reproducibility for both depression diagnosis and suicide risk classification (overall κ = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Symptom summarization was substantially improved with RAG, with relative gains of 44.1–207.2% in BLEU‑2 and 37.0–94.0% in ROUGE‑L. Clinician‑blinded ratings indicated clinician-evaluated high-level empathic expression in RAG‑enhanced models (mean scores 4.23–4.98/5), with Qwen3 + RAG exhibiting particularly strong emotional concordance (95% CI: 4.80–4.92). Dialogue quality was rated as high across domains, including fluency (mean 4.98/5) and perceived doctor‑likeness (mean 4.94/5).

conclusionsA domain‑specific, RAG‑enhanced LLM framework can deliver clinically reliable, reproducible, and empathetic depression screening and suicide risk stratification in both real‑world and simulated settings. Local on‑premises deployment supports privacy and data‑governance requirements, while the scalable architecture and structured outputs position this approach as a promising tool for augmenting mental health triage and longitudinal monitoring in resource‑constrained environments.

Indexed as

DepressionDepressive DisorderLarge Language ModelsMass ScreeningSuicideHumansRisk AssessmentClinical decision supportDepression screeningEmpathic human–AI interactionLarge language modelsMental health triageRetrieval‑augmented generationSuicide risk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41917861
PMCPMC13162430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.