ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Spatially decoupled reliable mutual learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSemi-Supervised Learning reduces the annotation burden for medical image segmentation but currently suffers from spatial context overfitting and confirmation bias due to noisy pseudo-labels. This study aims to propose a robust framework to overcome these limitations.
methodsWe introduce a novel framework termed Spatially Decoupled Reliable Mutual Learning (SDRML). To address context overfitting, we propose a Spatial Decoupling strategy that utilizes translation consistency, compelling the model to focus on intrinsic anatomical features rather than fixed background contexts. To mitigate confirmation bias, we design a Reliable Mutual Learning mechanism incorporating a Confident Regional Cross-entropy loss. This loss dynamically filters low-confidence predictions, ensuring only reliable pseudo-labels guide the tri-model co-training process.
resultsExtensive experiments were conducted on the ACDC (2D MRI), Left Atrium (3D MRI), and Pancreas-CT datasets. SDRML significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods across all benchmarks. Notably, it demonstrates superior robustness and segmentation accuracy in data-scarce scenarios, such as regimes with only 10% labeled data.
conclusionsSDRML effectively resolves spatial dependency and noise accumulation issues in SSL. By leveraging spatial decoupling and reliable noise filtering, it provides a highly effective solution for medical image segmentation with limited annotations.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.