ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Reliability and validity of the Kurdish version of the patient health questionnaire-15 in a trauma-affected population.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSomatic symptoms are common among trauma-exposed populations and are often associated with persistent distress and functional impairment, highlighting the need for culturally appropriate assessment tools.
objectiveThis study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), a screening measure of somatic symptom burden, into Central Kurdish and assess its psychometric properties among survivors of chemical gas exposure.
methodsA total of 534 survivors were recruited through community and registry sources. After translation and cultural adaptation, item 4 and item 11 were removed due to cultural and gender-specific considerations and limited psychometric performance, resulting in a 13-item version. Factor structure was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). Measurement invariance across gender and age groups was evaluated using multi-group CFA. Internal consistency was assessed using McDonald’s omega. An exploratory network analysis (EBICglasso) examined conditional associations among symptoms.
resultsBoth a unidimensional CFA model (CFI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.054) and a three-factor ESEM model (CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.046) showed good model fit, with the ESEM structure providing a more differentiated representation of pain/fatigue, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary domains. Measurement invariance testing supported full scalar invariance across gender, while partial metric invariance was observed across age groups. Internal consistency was acceptable (ω = 0.70–0.83). Network estimates demonstrated acceptable stability, with correlation stability coefficients of 0.59 for edge strength and 0.52 for bridge strength, and should be interpreted as exploratory.
conclusionThe culturally adapted 13-item Kurdish PHQ demonstrates acceptable reliability and initial evidence of construct validity in trauma-exposed survivors of chemical attacks. The instrument may be used as a screening tool for somatic symptom burden in this context, while further validation in broader Kurdish populations is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.