Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917822›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2026

Health-promotion can sustain leisure participation among persons 80 years and older: results from the randomised controlled trial elderly persons in the risk zone.

Roar Hermansen Østby, Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff, Jenna Najar, Qarin Lood

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00877058 (Elderly Persons at the Risk Zone - a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Based Preventive Multiprofessional Program for Old Persons at Risk of Frailty), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00877058 nacompletednot on this map

Elderly Persons at the Risk Zone - a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Based Preventive Multiprofessional Program for Old Persons at Risk of Frailty

TypeinterventionalSponsorVardalinstitutet The Swedish Institute for Health SciencesRan2008 to 2011Enrolled459ConditionsFrail Elderly PersonsArmspreventive home visit, senior meetings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roar Hermansen ØstbyUniversity of Gothenburg, Box 455, Gothenburg, SE- 40530, Sweden.
Synneve Dahlin-IvanoffDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 15, vån 3 SU/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Sweden.
Jenna NajarDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 15, vån 3 SU/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Sweden.
Qarin LoodUniversity of Gothenburg, Box 455, Gothenburg, SE- 40530, Sweden. Qarin.lood@neuro.gu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipation in leisure activities is associated with better health, greater life satisfaction, and improved quality of life in older persons, yet it tends to decline with age. Although health-promotion interventions positively influence such participation, evidence is limited for persons aged 80 years and older. This study aimed to examine whether a preventive home visit or senior meetings affect participation in leisure activities among community-dwelling persons aged 80 years or older.

methodsThe study was conducted in Gothenburg, Sweden, applying an exploratory, randomised, three-armed, single-blind, controlled trial with a parallel-group design. Participants were 459 independent, community-dwelling persons aged 80 years or older, randomly assigned to one of two interventions or an inert control group using opaque envelopes. A total of 178 participants were randomised to the preventive home visit group, 199 to the senior meetings group, and 114 to the control group. Participants analysed were 174, 171, and 114 respectively. Interventions included either a preventive home visit or senior meetings. The primary outcome was participation in leisure activities at 12- and 24-months post-baseline. Outcome assessors were blinded after assignment.

resultsAt 12-months, the senior meetings group sustained participation in senior activities (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05–2.99), reading (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.03–3.25), and hobbies (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.14–3.33), compared with controls. The preventive home visit group sustained participation in hobbies (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.03–2.94), compared with controls. At 24-months, the senior meetings group sustained participation in study circles (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.09–3.66), reading (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.07-3.00) and hobbies (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.12–3.12), compared with controls. The preventive home visit group sustained participation in reading (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.24–3.52), compared with controls. No adverse effects were reported.

conclusionsSenior meetings supported sustained participation in several leisure activities among persons aged 80 and older over 24 months. Tailoring support to individual needs and adapting to changing abilities may enhance long-term participation and well-being. Key elements of effective interventions may include providing information, fostering positive attitudes, and encouraging open dialogue about leisure.

trial registrationThe study was registered 08/04/2009 at ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT00877058.

Indexed as

Health PromotionHouse CallsLeisure ActivitiesAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodSwedenHealth-promotionHobbiesInterventionLeisure activitiesMunicipal careOlder adultsPreventionRecreation

Identifiers

PMID41917822
PMCPMC13063440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.