ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Exploring Cognitive, Behavioral, and Psychological Dimensions in Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain and Other Chronic Orofacial Pain Conditions.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Symptom Persistence Across Selected Orofacial Conditions: Toward a Chronic Explanatory Profile.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic orofacial pain (COP) is a complex condition often resistant to treatment and associated with psychological comorbidities. Yet, its neuropsychological profile remains under-investigated. This case-control study aims to identify the cognitive, behavioral, and psychological profiles of COP and their associations with clinical symptoms, with a focus on persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP), a condition particularly underexplored.
methodsA cohort of 42 patients (COPc), including 23 with PIFP, and 42 healthy controls (HCs) underwent a comprehensive assessment of mood, coping strategies, personality traits, cognitive functioning, and social well-being. Between-group and correlation analyses were performed, and Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons.
resultsThe psychological framework of COPc was marked by depressive symptoms, loneliness, alexithymia, poor quality of life, and low physical and mental well-being. Personality assessment indicated worthlessness. Catastrophizing was a dominant coping strategy, characterized by helplessness and rumination. Cognitive assessments revealed deficits in attention and executive functions. PIFP patients exhibited particularly psychological vulnerabilities, namely, catastrophizing thinking and difficulties in describing their own feelings. Correlation analyses showed complex relationships between cognitive, behavioral, and psychological impairments in COPc, and a strong association between the negative impact of pain symptoms on social life and psychological, catastrophizing, and cognitive functioning.
conclusionsThis is the first study to characterize the neuropsychological profile of PIFP and COP conditions, revealing a complex interplay of cognitive, behavioral, and psychological vulnerabilities. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both neuropsychological and social functioning in the management of chronic pain to improve patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.