Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917747›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Computed tomography for four-dimensional dose calculation: Effect of detector array length.

Inhwan Yeo, Qianyi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inhwan YeoDepartment of Advanced Radiation and Proton Therapy, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-0512
Qianyi XuRadiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFour-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is susceptible to a geometrical error when respiration changes upon patient shift. 4DCT using 16-cm detector arrays, not needing the shift, has been shown to improve geometrical accuracy, compared with a conventional 4DCT (4-cm array), albeit with some Hounsfield unit discrepancies. The 4DCTs were validated for 4D planning. MATERIALS AND

methodsA lung-mimicking phantom containing a spherical target with ten respiratory traces and three tumor-shaped targets with their traces was respectively imaged when, to each of the ten-positions/phases, the lung was moved (1) step-wisely by helical scan at each movement (ground truth; 4DCT

results(1) 4DCT

conclusionsThe 4DCT

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansProton TherapyRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRespiration16 cm‐length detector for 4DCT4D doserespiratory artifacts

Identifiers

PMID41917747
PMCPMC13140505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.