ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Assessing the microstructure of simple rhamphothecae in chickens (Aves: Galliformes: Gallus gallus domesticus).
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneous sheaths on the jaws of beaked tetrapods, or rhamphothecae, are classified as simple or compound based on their external morphology. In birds, simple rhamphothecae possess single corneous sheaths covering the upper jaws and the mandibles, respectively, rather than the several corneous plates of compound rhamphothecae. More than 60% of modern birds have simple rhamphothecae, but not all birds with simple rhamphothecae use their beaks for the same feeding style or dietary preferences. Grossly similar simple rhamphothecae may possess unreported microanatomical differences in response to different functional demands, but this requires first exploring whether the microanatomy of simple rhamphothecae is homogenous. We hypothesized based on foraging biomechanics that the rostral portion of the rhamphotheca is more mechanically resistant than the caudal portion, and the microanatomy will reflect this. We examine the microanatomy and biomechanical properties of rhamphothecae using chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). We map the microstructure and relative hardness of corneous materials throughout the rhamphotheca using plastic-embedded histology and microindentation. Histological sections reveal eight corneous regions, more numerous on the rostral portion of the beak, making up the seemingly continuous corneous sheath of the upper jaws and mandibles. Microindentation of individual regions reveals hardness differences, with the rostral rhamphothecal tomia (cutting edge) having the highest hardness, and layers comprising the caudal portion of the rhamphotheca having the lowest. This configuration shows that more resistant corneous layers are found rostrally to accommodate the mechanical interactions happening at the tip. Our study shows that unreported complexity within simple beaks will allow us to determine simple rhamphotheca diversity and address the homoplasy of simple rhamphothecae in modern birds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.