ArticleNursing open2026
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Content Validity Assessment of the Spanish Diabetes Management Knowledge Assessment Tool-14 for Nursing Home Nurses.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study is to describe the initial phase of the psychometric validation process, specifically focusing on the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of the Diabetes Management Knowledge Assessment Tool-17 (DMKAT-17) for Spanish nursing home settings.
designMethodological study of translation, cross-cultural adaptation and content validation.
methodThe translation and cultural adaptation process followed the ten steps recommended by Wild et al. Content validity was assessed using expert judgement and the modified Lawshe model proposed by Tristán-López. An expert panel evaluated the relevance of the items, and the content validity ratio and content validity index were calculated.
resultsThe DMKAT-17 was reviewed by 13 experts. Based on expert ratings and qualitative feedback, items 1, 2 and 6 were removed, and wording changes were made to improve clarity and contextual appropriateness. This process resulted in a 14-item Spanish version (DMKAT-14). The scale-level content validity index was 0.841, indicating acceptable content validity based on expert judgement. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study provides a preliminary adapted Spanish version of the DMKAT-14 for the nursing home context and offers an initial basis for future psychometric evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.