ReviewNursing open2026
Factors Associated With Transition of Care in Patients With Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study.
Review in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo assess the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the quality of care transitions among individuals with chronic non-communicable diseases after hospital discharge.
designCross-sectional, single-centre study.
methodParticipants were people with chronic diseases who underwent clinical or surgical treatment and were discharged from a hospital in southern Brazil. Data were collected from March to July 2021. The study used clinical and sociodemographic characterisation instruments at the bedside; after hospital discharge, the care transitions measure-15 (CTM-15) was conducted by telephone. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were applied.
resultsA total of 487 participants were included, with a mean age of 60.6 years; 67.4% were classified as having satisfactory care transitions. In the adjusted model, a higher likelihood of satisfactory transitions was observed among individuals who underwent surgical treatment (OR = 2.974; p < 0.001), those without family income (OR = 2.546; p < 0.001), White individuals (OR = 1.705; p = 0.027), and women (OR = 1.589; p = 0.042). Discharge with clinical devices was also associated with satisfactory transitions (OR = 1.245; p = 0.043). Conversely, individuals with family income between R$1100 and R$3299 showed a lower likelihood of satisfactory transitions, although this association was not statistically significant (OR = 0.724; p = 0.066).
conclusionClinical and sociodemographic characteristics significantly influence the quality of care transitions. The results highlight social and contextual factors and show that effective transitions require strategies that integrate clinical needs with the social determinants shaping the care experience. Transition practices that are sensitive to patients' social, cultural and economic contexts may help strengthen equity and safety in post-discharge continuity of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: These findings reinforce the need for individualised discharge planning, clear interprofessional communication and health education adapted to patients' literacy levels and social conditions. Such measures can improve safety, autonomy and treatment continuity for patients with chronic conditions and support professionals in developing context-responsive care transition strategies. REPORTING
methodThis study followed the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients participated in the data collection by answering the care transitions measure-15 after hospital discharge, directly contributing to the interpretation of the care transitions data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.