Observational studyJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2026
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in a Specialist Hypertension Clinic: A Pragmatic Real-World Single-Center Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients referred to specialist hypertension clinics often have complex disease characterized by secondary causes, treatment resistance and coexisting kidney disease. Real-world outcome data in this setting remain limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 199 patients attending a tertiary hypertension clinic between January 2017 and December 2023. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, antihypertensive therapy, and blood pressure (BP) were recorded. BP changes were assessed annually for up to 3 years. Subgroup analyses examined outcomes by age, sex, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity, resistant hypertension, secondary hypertension, and baseline systolic BP. Cardiovascular events were identified from clinical records. Mean age of patients was 44.1 ± 14.0 years and 61.3% were male. Secondary hypertension was present in 32.7% and resistant hypertension in 17.2%. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (IQR 4.7-30.1), with follow-up BP available for 146 patients. Mean baseline BP was 156/97 mmHg. At final follow-up, significant reductions were observed, with mean systolic and diastolic BP decreases of -13.6 and -8.8 mmHg, respectively (both p < 0.001). BP improvements were consistent across clinical subgroups. Qualitative urine antihypertensive drug screening identified medication non-adherence in a subset of patients, with targeted interventions associated with subsequent BP improvement. Cardiovascular events were infrequent (6.5%). This study shows that specialist hypertension care achieves substantial BP reductions in complex real-world patients. Objective assessment of medication adherence appears clinically valuable, although BP control remains challenging and residual cardiovascular risk persists. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to define predictors of cardiovascular outcomes and optimize care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.