Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917629›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Assessment of Adolescent Growth and Development.

Haris Khurram

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Haris KhurramNational University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Chiniot-Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, Pakistan. haris.khurram@nu.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating growth and development is crucial to understanding the health status of adolescents. This assessment, through physical examination, requires healthcare experts and can be challenging due to subjectivity and privacy concerns. Similarly, psychosocial growth is subjective and also requires complex evaluations by professionals. This complexity makes physical growth assessment based on anthropometric measures a more useful and convenient indicator for monitoring growth. Therefore, anthropometric measurements should be assessed with more precise methods and calibrated equipment. Considerations of precision, reliability, and validity are essential for growth assessments when planning health strategies, nutritional status, and overall well-being. The study design should be carefully selected based on the objectives. An adequate sample size is also critical in capturing the true variability of the study population. Adolescents undergo a growth spurt due to prepuberty and puberty; thus, the development of growth centile charts necessitates appropriate assessment methodology and validations to effectively evaluate growth status and capture its variations. The differences, velocity, and acceleration charts are essential in creating reference growth centiles for a population, especially for adolescents. The appropriate statistical methodology, based on exploratory data analysis and modeling for estimating centiles, has fundamental implications. GAMLSS is a more flexible model that can capture the growth spurt due to puberty in adolescents, utilizing various distribution families, smoothing functions, and the ability to model each parameter with multiple covariates. Cross-validation enhances confidence in the generalizability of the statistical model and growth centiles for the target population. These growth centile charts are vital for early detection of growth disorders, nutritional assessments, monitoring, and informed decision-making in clinical and public health contexts.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentAdolescentAnthropometryGrowth ChartsHumansPubertyAdolescentsGAMLSSGrowth assessmentGrowth centilesGrowth chartsNutrition status

Identifiers

PMID41917629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.