ArticleGeroScience2026
Prevalence and determinants of ageism experiences in the Singapore population: insights from the HEalthy LOngevity (HELO) survey.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ageism refers to stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination based on age. Ageism negatively impacts physical and mental health across the lifespan, yet knowledge about the experience of ageism in Singapore is limited. This study evaluated the prevalence of experienced ageism in Singapore and identified its key determinants within a nationally representative cohort. In the cross-sectional HEalthy LOngevity (HELO) survey (N = 3034), ageism was measured using the newly launched World Health Organization (WHO) Ageism Experiences Scale. Associations with chronological age, perceived age, gender, socioeconomic, and health-related factors were examined using nonparametric tests and multivariable linear regression. Respondents' median chronological age was 46 [interquartile range (IQR): 34-59] years, and 54.1% were female. Experiences of ageism were reported by 49.4% of respondents. Total ageism scores were on average 1.5 points higher among the youngest (21-30 years) and oldest (71+ years) age groups and approximately 1 point higher among respondents with lower socioeconomic status, particularly those with lower education levels. Respondents who felt older than their chronological age reported significantly higher ageism scores. This first large-scale study on ageism in Singapore reveals high experienced ageism, consistent with global estimates, particularly among older and younger adults. Feeling older was one of the strongest ageism predictors. Addressing ageism by targeting social determinants and subjective ageing perceptions is essential to promote healthy ageing and to inform public health policy and interventions in Singapore.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.