ReviewCarbon balance and management2026
Progress in the study of product methodology development and competitiveness assessment model of voluntary carbon offsets.
Review in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Carbon reduction multidimensional ternary model for robotic 3D printing prefabricated construction across hotels star levels.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on methodological advancements in voluntary carbon reduction market products and the optimization of competitiveness evaluation models. Through systematic literature review, it analyzes the development characteristics, application scenarios, and existing challenges of international mainstream standards (VCS, GS, CDM) and domestic CCER and carbon credit methodologies. Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as the core framework, the research optimizes a competitiveness evaluation model covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions. A case study of eco-friendly home appliances is conducted for validation, followed by multi-directional comparisons with five existing models. Results indicate that international methodologies emphasize rigor and sustainability verification, while domestic approaches prioritize policy adaptability but face fragmentation challenges. The improved model demonstrates superior performance in environmental and social dimension evaluations compared to traditional models, offering enhanced comprehensiveness and specificity. This study provides scientific tools for methodological selection and competitiveness assessment of voluntary carbon reduction products, offering decision support for carbon market standardization and low-carbon economic transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.