Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917532›Full record

ReviewCarbon balance and management2026

Progress in the study of product methodology development and competitiveness assessment model of voluntary carbon offsets.

Jin Han, Shaofeng Zheng, Jing Yuan, Congguang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin HanSchool of Public Administration, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Shaofeng ZhengHuangpu Customs District Technology Center, Dongguan, 523000, China.
Jing YuanInstitute of Carbon-Neutral Technology, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Congguang ZhangInstitute of Carbon-Neutral Technology, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, 518055, China. qaulxxj@hotmail.com.

Funding

Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Regular Project 2023 GD23XGL118Shenzhen Polytechnic University Institutional Launching Projects 6023312045Kthe Science and Technology Project Program of Shaanxi Provincial Corporation of China National Tobacco Corporation KJ-2024-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on methodological advancements in voluntary carbon reduction market products and the optimization of competitiveness evaluation models. Through systematic literature review, it analyzes the development characteristics, application scenarios, and existing challenges of international mainstream standards (VCS, GS, CDM) and domestic CCER and carbon credit methodologies. Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as the core framework, the research optimizes a competitiveness evaluation model covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions. A case study of eco-friendly home appliances is conducted for validation, followed by multi-directional comparisons with five existing models. Results indicate that international methodologies emphasize rigor and sustainability verification, while domestic approaches prioritize policy adaptability but face fragmentation challenges. The improved model demonstrates superior performance in environmental and social dimension evaluations compared to traditional models, offering enhanced comprehensiveness and specificity. This study provides scientific tools for methodological selection and competitiveness assessment of voluntary carbon reduction products, offering decision support for carbon market standardization and low-carbon economic transition.

Indexed as

Carbon marketCompetitiveness assessmentMethodology developmentSustainable developmentVoluntary carbon reduction

Identifiers

PMID41917532
PMCPMC13169573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.