Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917531›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026

Interspecies interactions drive bacterial proteome reorganization and emergent metabolism.

Stephan Kamrad, Simran K Aulakh, Simone Mozzachiodi, Sonja Blasche, David Scheidweiler, Arianna Basile, Rui Guan, Rob Bradley, Naomi Iris van den Berg, Michael Mülleder and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Microbial pairing alters metabolic wiring.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephan KamradThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-4661
Simran K AulakhThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-7144
Simone MozzachiodiThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0950-8674
Sonja BlascheThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-0474
David ScheidweilerThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-455X
Arianna BasileThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2461-5221
Rui GuanThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rob BradleyThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7781-9503
Naomi Iris van den BergThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michael MüllederCore Facility High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-3861
Markus RalserDepartment of Biochemistry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-7413
Kiran R PatilThe Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. kp533@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-8640

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 866028Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) LT0018/2023RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00025/11Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) P500PB_211100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species in microbial communities need to stave off competition and capitalize on new resources that become available because of metabolic activities of others. However, intra-cellular molecular changes that underpin these responses are understudied, preventing mechanistic insights into community function and dynamics. Here we analyse proteomic and metabolomic responses in 104 pairwise co-cultures of 15 gut bacteria, spanning a diversity of ecological interactions from competition to mutualism. We find that molecular responses to co-culturing are substantial, with typically 50% of the quantified proteome changing in at least one co-culture, jointly influenced by genome size, species abundance and pH. Even closely related species and orthologue proteins show different expression profiles in response to the same partner, indicating functional diversification at both protein and species level. Small-molecule transport and carbon metabolism are among the most responsive processes, indicating pervasive metabolic interactions. Using metabolomics, we identify likely cross-fed metabolites, emergent polyamine metabolism and niche partitioning in amino acid utilization. Overall, our study uncovers how bacteria respond to the presence of other species through extensive remodelling of their proteome and metabolome.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsMetabolomeMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaProteomeBacterial ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID41917531
PMCPMC13253324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.