ArticleScientific reports2026
Data mining-based lung cancer diagnostic models and high-risk warning for occupational group.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Screening is the key to improving the five-year survival rate of lung cancer patients. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for lung cancer and to achieve screening and early warning of individuals at high risk of lung cancer in the coke oven worker population. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 185 lung cancer patients and 163 normal controls were included. To screen for biomarkers, we established a mouse lung cancer model and a cellular malignant transformation model. Proteomics was utilised to screen for differentially expressed proteins. Data mining techniques were applied to combine candidate molecular markers of lung cancer with traditional tumor markers to construct lung cancer screening models. The population of coke oven workers was screened for individuals at high risk of lung cancer. CDH1, CLEC3B, CLU, sCD146 and VIM were investigated as candidate markers. Among all the screening models, support vector machine and C5.0 models performed better based on eight protein markers and epidemiological information. The models were applied to predict individuals at high risk of lung cancer among coke oven workers, and a total of 13 high-risk individuals were screened. Dysregulated expression of CDH1, CLU, CLEC3B, sCD146 and VIM was associated with lung cancer. Support vector machine and C5.0 models proved to be more effective and could be applied to screen high-risk individuals among coke oven workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.