Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917485›Full record

ReviewBiodegradation2026

Application of biosurfactants as remediation option in the bioremediation of synthetic dyes.

Inès Mnif, Mouna Bouassida, Dhouha Ghribi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inès MnifFaculty of Science of Gabes, 6072, Gabes, Tunisia. inesmnif2011@gmail.com.
Mouna BouassidaHigher Institute of Biotechnology, Sfax, Tunisia.
Dhouha GhribiLaboratory of Plant Improvement and Valorization of Agricultural Resources, National School of Engineering, Sfax, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic dyes are among the major environmental pollutants and are generally considered recalcitrant and persistent organic compounds owing to their complex chemical structures, strong resistance to biodegradation and ability to bioaccumulate in living tissue. As a result, chemical industries contribute significantly to environmental pollution, which disrupts natural equilibrium and endangers the biodiversity of plants, animals and microorganisms. Therefore, there is growing interest in removing synthetic dyes from both terrestrial and aquatic environments. Numerous physico-chemical, biological and combined approaches have been developed for this purpose. Using biosurfactants for dye biosorption and/or enhancing biological dye treatment appears to be a promising option for achieving this goal. Biosurfactants are surface-active substances produced by microbial strains. To identify new microbial strains that produce biosurfactants, various screening techniques have been developed. They are distinguished by a great deal of structural diversity as well as a wide range of biological and functional activities.

Indexed as

BiosurfactantsColoring AgentsEnvironmental PollutantsSurface-Active AgentsBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalColoring AgentsEnvironmental PollutantsSurface-Active AgentsBiosurfactantsClassificationImprovementScreeningSynthetic dyesTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.