ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Epidemiological insights of lumpy skin disease and farmer's adaptive responses in India.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study documented critical field epidemiological parameters of Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) and farmer-adopted mitigation strategies, utilizing primary data collected from 2,351 cattle farms across seven states in India. Reported clinical LSD incidence was 76–94% in the surveyed villages and 30–57% in the surveyed farms across the study states. LSD incidence was observed round the year but the peak incidence period varied across the states. The pooled reported clinical incidence and farmer-reported mortality levels across the study states was 23.4% and 4.0% and 22.3% and 5.5%, in crossbred and indigenous cattle, respectively. The number of days LSD persisted ranged between 30 and 85 days in the villages and 15–37 days in the farms. Farmers adopted multiple mitigation measures, including vaccination, vector control, traditional treatments, and livestock insurance, along with biosecurity practices such as isolation of sick animals, restriction of animal movement and disinfection measures, though adoption levels varied across regions. Overall, the findings highlight strengthening vaccination coverage, alongside improved biosecurity, may reduce the LSD burden under similar field conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.