ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2026
Breast cancer detection via targeted enzymatic methyl sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer (BC) is crucial for improving patient survival, yet current screening methods such as mammography exhibit limitations in sensitivity, especially in dense breasts. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker for cancer detection. This study aimed to identify BC-specific DNA methylation markers from plasma ctDNA and develop a machine learning model for the early and accurate detection of BC. We constructed a BC-specific methylation profile by analyzing differentially methylated positions (DMPs) between 75 paired BC and adjacent normal tissues from TCGA. A total of 396 plasma samples were prospectively collected and divided into training (94 BC, 144 controls), validation (31 BC, 48 controls), and test sets (31 BC, 48 controls). A machine learning model was built using BC-specific DMPs, and its performance was evaluated via ROC analysis. Correlation between methylation levels and conventional biomarkers (CEA, ER) was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient. We identified 107 DMPs from TCGA that exhibited high variance (> 0.001) in ctDNA. A model based on 21 DMPs achieved high accuracy in the training set (AUC = 0.972, sensitivity = 90.48%, specificity = 91.20%), with consistent performance in validation (AUC = 0.886) and test sets (AUC = 0.817). Methylation levels at four sites showed moderate to strong correlation with CEA and ER expression (all p < 0.05). This study demonstrates that a ctDNA methylation-based machine learning model can effectively distinguish BC from non-cancerous conditions with robust sensitivity and specificity, supporting its potential as a complementary tool for early BC detection. These findings underscore the clinical relevance of ctDNA methylation signatures and highlight the promise of integrating liquid biopsy with machine learning in future cancer screening strategies. This study provides a novel methylation-driven framework for BC screening that complements existing biomarkers. Future work should validate these markers in larger multi-center cohorts and explore their utility in monitoring treatment response and recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.