ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Effect of stinging nettle powder (Urtica dioica) supplementation on productive and physiological performance of laying hens.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of stinging nettle powder (SN) supplementation on productive and physiological performance of laying hens. A total of 72 Inshas strain laying hens (30 weeks old) were randomly distributed individually and divided into three treatment groups (n = 24 hens per treatment) with three replicates per treatment, 8 birds/ replicate. SN0 (the control), SN0.5%, and SN1%, respectively. Egg numbers were collected and weighed daily, and body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, egg production, and egg mass were measured and calculated monthly. Two internal and external egg quality, biological parameters, and some body parts’ weight from the carcass test, and the results were as follows: The productive performance was not affected by SN supplements nor the internal and external egg quality, except that shell thickness was significantly increased (p ≤ 0.001). Hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cells (RBCs), white blood cells (WBCs), and platelets were significantly increased (p ≤ 0.001). Additionally, plasma phosphorus levels increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05). In contrast, plasma enzymes (U/L) aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cholesterol, triglycerides, and uric acid were decreased considerably (p ≤ 0.01) as a result of dietary interventions. In contrast, there was a notable rise in egg production, egg weight, and egg mass when 1% SN supplementation was added compared to control and 0.5% SN. Neither carcass traits nor some body parts were affected by SN supplements. Based on these findings, we propose that feeding laying hens 1% SN will enhance their egg quality and biochemical profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.