Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917386›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Neuronal Axon Generation/Regeneration Regulated by Sulfated Glycans.

Kenji Kadomatsu, Kazuma Sakamoto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenji KadomatsuInstitute for Glyco-core Research (iGCORE), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan. kkadoma@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Kazuma SakamotoInstitute for Glyco-core Research (iGCORE), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan. sakamoto@inst-hsc.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been recognized that central nerve axons do not regenerate spontaneously in adults. On the other hand, it is also known that axons of embryonic neurons and peripheral neurons, even of adults, can regenerate and reconstruct neural circuits. These differences can be attributed to intrinsic factors, that is, the regenerative capacities of neurons, and extrinsic factors, that is, the extracellular environments. Recent analyses at the single-cell level have led to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie differences in the regenerative ability of neurons. At the same time, our understanding of the extracellular environments that determine whether neural axons can regenerate has also advanced. Sulfated glycans, which are sugar chains known as "third life chains" in addition to nucleic acids and proteins, are among the most important extracellular molecules involved in conferring regenerative capacity. Once thought to be merely a physical barrier to neuronal axons, the sulfated glycans have recently been shown to inhibit neuronal axon regeneration via their specific neuronal receptors and intracellular signaling. In this chapter, we will introduce the recent advances in our understanding of the regulation of nerve axons by sulfated glycans, while unraveling the history of research on axon regeneration.

Indexed as

AxonsNerve RegenerationPolysaccharidesSulfatesAnimalsHumansSignal TransductionPolysaccharidesSulfatesAutophagyAxon regenerationChondroitin sulfateDystrophic endballHeparan sulfateReceptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase

Identifiers

PMID41917386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.