ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Postmarketing surveillance study of asciminib in patients with resistant/intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in Japan.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following asciminib's initial approval in Japan for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant or intolerant to previous therapy, this all-patient, postmarketing surveillance study was initiated. Predefined safety specifications, overall safety, and effectiveness were assessed for 48 weeks from asciminib initiation (safety analysis set, n = 523). The approved daily dose of asciminib (80 mg [40 mg twice daily]) was most frequently used (63.9%) and not exceeded. Discontinuations (28.5%) were primarily due to adverse events (18.2%), including disease progression. Incidences of the safety specifications myelosuppression, pancreatitis, QT interval prolongation, infections, vascular occlusive events, and photosensitivity were 8.6%, 4.4%, 2.5%, 1.3%, 0.2%, and 0%, respectively, with low rates of treatment discontinuation for these events. There were no notable trends in the rates or types of adverse drug reactions in patients aged ≥ 65 years or with concurrent renal impairment, hepatic impairment, or cardiac dysfunction. The cumulative major molecular response rate was 61.2% by week 48 and was not affected by age (≥ 65 years) or comorbidities. Cumulative MR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.