ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Comparison of neonatal outcomes of term neonates with meconium-stained amniotic fluid before and after routine endotracheal suctioning strategy at birth.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) among neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) before and after discontinuation of endotracheal suctioning for non-vigorous neonates.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across three centers comparing two eras. Neonates born through MSAF at ≥36 weeks' gestation were included. Multivariable regression adjusted for sex and birth center.
resultsAmong 8635 neonates (5554 Era 1; 3081 Era 2), including 1053 non-vigorous neonates, unadjusted MAS incidence did not differ between eras overall (4.8% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.17) or among non-vigorous neonates (21.0% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.55). After adjustment, Era 2 was associated with higher odds of MAS overall (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11-1.69) and among non-vigorous neonates (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.07-2.22). Respiratory distress was higher in Era 2, while other outcomes assessed were unchanged.
conclusionsDiscontinuation of routine suctioning was associated with increased MAS incidence among neonates born through MSAF.
Identifiers
41917300What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.