ArticleOdontology2026
Experimental adhesive systems with kaempferol: properties, antibacterial effect and demineralization inhibition.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the antibacterial effect of an experimental adhesive system containing kaempferol and its dentin bond strength. The etch-and-rinse adhesive system was manipulated and kaempferol was incorporated at the following concentrations: without KA, 1%, 2% and 4% (K0, K1%, K2%, and K4%). The antibacterial effects of the adhesive system were assessed by the planktonic cell count (n = 5) and metabolic activity of the S. mutans biofilm using MTT reduction. Demineralization inhibition was evaluated through Knoop hardness at the enamel margin before and after exposure to the S. mutans biofilm (n = 5). Additionally, microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured using a microtensile test (n = 6), and the degree of conversion (DC%) was assessed using FT-IR spectroscopy (n = 5). Results indicated that the planktonic cell count was lower for K4% and K2% than the K0, which did not differ from K1%. K4%, K2%, and K1% exhibited lower biofilm metabolic activity than K0. Furthermore, these groups showed less loss of hardness at restoration margins than K0. Similar results of μTBS were found for all groups (26.86-31.23 MPa). The DC% for K1% and K2% was similar to K0, while K4% demonstrated a significantly higher DC% than K0 and K1%, but no difference from K2%. In conclusion, adhesive systems with kaempferol had an antibacterial effect and prevented the enamel demineralization, without jeopardizing μTBS and DC%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.