Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41917265›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Short-read genome sequencing at population scale: diagnostic insights from 2317 patients.

Søren L Faergeman, Lotte Andreasen, Naja Becher, Mette Christiansen, Claus H Gravholt, Uffe B Jensen, Jens Magnus Bernth Jensen, Ole H Larsen, Sara Markholt, Katrine S Sandgaard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Expanding the genomic world: from disease to society.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  3. Advances in genomic medicine: from diagnosis to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Søren L FaergemanDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. soefae@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-1578
Lotte AndreasenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Naja BecherDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mette ChristiansenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5158-3670
Claus H GravholtDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-1720
Uffe B JensenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-6355
Jens Magnus Bernth JensenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5004-7822
Ole H LarsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sara MarkholtDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Katrine S SandgaardInstitute of Clinical Medicine; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren VangDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1899-4205
Dorte L LildballeDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0223-1673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the Danish National Genome Centre (DNGC) initiative, the Central Denmark Region has implemented short-read whole-genome sequencing (srWGS) as a first-tier diagnostic tool for suspected monogenetic disorders. Despite increasing adoption of genome sequencing, evidence from large-scale implementation across clinical specialties remains limited. Here, we evaluate the implementation from patient inclusion and srWGS scaling to diagnostic performance. From 2021 to 2024, we sequenced 2317 patients with suspected genetic diseases across a wide range of medical specialities. Following clinical evaluation and informed consent, Illumina srWGS was performed. Patients were categorised into clinical subgroups based on phenotype and age to support targeted variant filtration and germline variant reporting. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield across all disease groups/categories. The project is a public/private partnership co-funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Diagnostic yield ranged from 6% in children with cancerto 60% in patients with skin disorders, with an overall yield of 20%. We observed substantial variation in the clinical use of srWGS as a first-tier diagnostic tool across patient categories. Regional implementation of srWGS within the DNGC framework demonstrates its scalability as a first-tier diagnostic tool for monogenic disorders. Importantly, the combination of expert-guided inclusion criteria for srWGS and mixed public/private funding has ensured equitable access to genetic diagnostics. We identify patient groups with high diagnostic returns well suited for srWGS, as well as groups where alternative strategies could also be applied.

Indexed as

Genetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingWhole Genome SequencingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDenmarkFemaleGenome, HumanHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID41917265
PMCPMC13246910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.