ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Short-read genome sequencing at population scale: diagnostic insights from 2317 patients.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Strategies in Pediatric Care: Addressing Rare Diseases in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expanding the genomic world: from disease to society.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Advances in genomic medicine: from diagnosis to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As part of the Danish National Genome Centre (DNGC) initiative, the Central Denmark Region has implemented short-read whole-genome sequencing (srWGS) as a first-tier diagnostic tool for suspected monogenetic disorders. Despite increasing adoption of genome sequencing, evidence from large-scale implementation across clinical specialties remains limited. Here, we evaluate the implementation from patient inclusion and srWGS scaling to diagnostic performance. From 2021 to 2024, we sequenced 2317 patients with suspected genetic diseases across a wide range of medical specialities. Following clinical evaluation and informed consent, Illumina srWGS was performed. Patients were categorised into clinical subgroups based on phenotype and age to support targeted variant filtration and germline variant reporting. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield across all disease groups/categories. The project is a public/private partnership co-funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Diagnostic yield ranged from 6% in children with cancerto 60% in patients with skin disorders, with an overall yield of 20%. We observed substantial variation in the clinical use of srWGS as a first-tier diagnostic tool across patient categories. Regional implementation of srWGS within the DNGC framework demonstrates its scalability as a first-tier diagnostic tool for monogenic disorders. Importantly, the combination of expert-guided inclusion criteria for srWGS and mixed public/private funding has ensured equitable access to genetic diagnostics. We identify patient groups with high diagnostic returns well suited for srWGS, as well as groups where alternative strategies could also be applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.