ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
A Multitask Deep Learning Approach for Tumor Segmentation and Morphological Quantification in Acral Melanoma Whole-Slide Images.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an integrated multitask deep learning framework for the automated analysis of acral melanoma from whole-slide images (WSIs). We constructed a multiscale WSI dataset with pixel-level annotations and developed a pipeline that sequentially performs classification, segmentation, and morphological quantification. An optimized ResNet50 classifier first screens for malignancy. For malignant cases, our novel D3C-RS-Unet, which integrates dual dilated dynamic convolution and channel attention mechanisms, performs precise tumor segmentation. Finally, key morphological indicators are automatically extracted. Using patient-level fivefold cross-validation, the classifier achieved an accuracy of 0.8947 ± 0.0098. The D3C-RS-Unet significantly outperformed baseline and state-of-the-art models (Dice: 0.8427 ± 0.0057; IoU: 0.8053 ± 0.0071; p
Indexed as
Identifiers
41917244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.